REFORMATION: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly: Martin Luther's Views on Jews

Imagine, for a moment, that your phone and devices suddenly started blowing up with notifications of news that a religious hate group had poisoned your town's water system. Imagine your social media was plastered with claims that the same religious group had placed Doctors in your local hospital who were purposefully poisoning patients and deliberately botching surgeries to cause the deaths of Christians. Imagine that the dead and dismembered bodies of children had been found in neighboring towns in what appeared to be ritual sacrifices conducted by this same group of religious zealots...

Now imagine that you had been advocating for religious liberty for these people, reaching out to them, ministering to them...Welcome to Martin Luther's shoes. These 3 RUMORS are what he was told about the Jews--that they had poisoned Protestant water wells, their Doctors were killing Christians and that they had kidnapped, murdered and dismembered children. These accusations were unproven and unfounded, but the RUMORS persisted. Luther was furious and he penned one of the most controversial works of the Reformation: "The Jews and Their Lies."

The devil that Martin Luther fought against is the same devil we wrestle with today, pitting brother against brother and preventing the spread of the Gospel any which way he can. The Jewish leaders of Luther's time had the same type of stronghold the Catholic leaders had, keeping the true Gospel away from the people. Martin Luther had turned his heart toward the Jewish people and sought to include them in the Reformation for most of his life, but his attitude drastically changed when he judged all Jews based on the rumored actions of a few.

Luther dealt with the same types of divisive lies, false teachings, racial tensions and sneaky rumors that we face today and we can learn as much from his mistakes as we can from his successes. He wrote some angry and disturbing words in his book. He also revealed much about the false teachings that were being used by Pharisaical leaders to keep Jews from coming to Christ and if we look carefully, we can learn more about how to minister effectively to Abraham's prodigal children, our long lost brothers and sisters the Jews, and how to combat the false religious teachers of our own day. 

Martin Luther highlights specific types of false teaching that were occurring in the Jewish synagogues. Let's take an objective look at what we can learn from his observations--both good and bad: 

The Prosperity Gospel:
According to Martin Luther, the Rabbi's of his day were teaching a type of Prosperity Gospel which claimed that the Messiah would come and take away the gold and silver of non-Jews and give it to people of Abrahamic descent. Luther was incensed because he felt the Jews of his day were committing usury by taking advantage of non-Jews and twisting Scripture (Deut. 23:19-20) to do it. He spoke and wrote against such usury with the same passion, intensity and anger with which he wrote against the abuses of Catholic Church leaders who had been taking advantage of others. He was wrong to stereotype all Jewish people as greedy users and should have focused his critique on the teaching itself and the leaders who perpetuated it. But he was right to preach against this false prosperity gospel and we should follow his example today because this is one of the primary tools Satan is using to ruin the teaching of the church and cause would-be-believers to mistrust and fall away. 

Blasphemy:
Luther reported that the Rabbi's of his day called Jesus tola, which means a hanged malefactor. They lied about Jesus and Mary, referring to Jesus as the bastard son of a whore, the offspring of a smith with whom Mary had intercourse. LIES! One rabbi called her Haria instead of Maria, which means "a heap of mud." Not only was there outrageous and blatant disrespect which is blasphemous, but they were committing outright heresy by claiming that Jesus was not the Son of God. Martin Luther was right to be angry. If those words don't bother you, you probably aren't a Christian. As we will learn, some of Luther's responses were offensive and incendiary, but they were heavily provoked and much more about religion than race. All believers should be zealous for God and for His name. But we should also be wise about the manner in which WE represent that name and carefully guarded in our reactions. 

Racist Theology
Luther believed that the Jewish leaders were teaching a type of racist theology similar to what alt-right white supremacist cults teach in America today. According to Luther, they claimed to be God's only people and to be of "high, noble blood, birth and descent" from Abraham and that all other people were less than human, regarded as worms and unworthy of salvation, including Gentiles, whom they called Goyim. According to Luther, they denied the image of God in all people and the truth of Scripture which declares: Understand, then, that those who have faith are the sons of Abraham. They refused to acknowledge that: There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. And they failed to believe the prophecy given to Abraham: And all the nations of the earth will be blessed by your offspring because you have obeyed My command. (Galatians 3:7, Galatians 3:28, Genesis 22:18) 

Martin Luther got overheated in his response. I think that most of us have written something in the heat of the moment and later realized that our words could have been more "gracious," "seasoned with salt" and "wise toward outsiders," the way the Bible says they should be. But opposing these false teachings was correct, appropriate and necessary. It is unfortunate that in correcting them for their failure to recognize the image of God in all people and to honor the value of all people, he devalues and degrades the Jews with his own words. 

The real trouble is revealed within Luther's advice to the government which I have organized into 6 disturbing points:

1. Incendiary Intentions Toward Synagogues and Jewish schools.

I have seen many online sources that claim Luther called for synagogues and Jewish schools to be burned down. The book translation I read simply calls for them to be avoided, but He does say that he believes Moses would have burned them down which seems to have been taken by many as an endorsement and instigation of such an action. In the Old Testament, it was appropriate and required that God's people tear down pagan altars, remove Asherah poles and destroy the "high places" of Ba'al worship. This does not apply to synagogues at all and I strongly disagree with Luther on Biblical grounds. 

The disciples and apostles regularly taught in synagogues. In fact, these meeting places were one of the primary venues where early Christianity was taught. Acts 17:1-2 records that Paul and his traveling companions came to Thessalonica, where there was a synagogue of the Jews. Then Paul, as was his custom, went in to them and for three Sabbaths reasoned with them from the Scriptures. He journeyed on to teach in the synagogues of Berea (Acts 17:10), Athens (verses 16-17), Corinth (Acts 18:4), and Ephesus (18:19). Apollos was also received and taught in the synagogue (Acts 18:26) and then Paul returned on a different trip to the synagogue in Ephesus (19:8). The synagogue was a place where the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob was worshipped and early Christianity was proclaimed directly inside its doors. When a synagogue turned them away, they would teach in a different location, but the synagogue was usually the first stop. 

It is also worth mentioning, that in addition to the synagogue in Athens, Paul also taught at the Aereopagus, or Mars Hill, in Athens. This was a place where multiple altars and monuments were erected in honor of numerous false gods. Paul's method was reason and Biblical teaching. Paul did not tear down the physical monuments because He was much more concerned with breaking down the walls and idols people had constructed in their hearts. This is the same attitude and position we should take as believers. It would have been appropriate for Martin Luther to walk right into those synagogues and share the good news about Messiah Yeshua (Jesus the Christ) just like the early disciples did, and then if they told lies about The Way, AVOID the synagogue and teach somewhere nearby, as Paul did (Acts 19:8-9). 

Respectful dialogue and patient teaching are thy way we share and spread our faith. The Old Testament tearing down of pagan places of worship was a type and a picture of the spiritual battle we fight now. When Paul wrote in his 2nd letter to the Corinthians, verses 10:4-5 about tearing down strongholds with God's word, he wasn't talking about demolishing buildings, but rather breaking down the walls and lies that keep people from coming to God. 

2. He asked that Jews not be allowed to own houses. 

This makes me sick to my stomach. This type of speech is inexcusable and absolutely horrifying. He has judged all Jews by the alleged actions of a few and there is no justification for this to be found anywhere within the pages of Scripture. He was wrong. 

3.  He advised that Jewish prayer books and the Talmud be taken away and rabbi's be forbidden from teaching.

Luther was a magisterial reformer, which means that he worked with the government. I do not agree with that type of Christian nationalism and I absolutely do not advocate or approve of censorship like this. I favor freedom of religion. The people at Ephesus voluntarily incinerated their books of witchcraft, but there is perhaps some historical information to be gleaned from the pages of the Talmud--the writings of rabbi's. The problem is that the Jewish people have always depended much too heavily on extra-biblical literature and have elevated the writings of rabbis too high. They consider books other than the bible to be Holy books and this IS wrong and dangerous. I believe it was the proliferation of extra-biblical writings that helped corrupt the Pharisees. No rabbinical writings are equal to Holy Scripture. The book of Titus bans Jewish mythology from the church and requires overseers to protect the church from them. For example the book of Enoch is full of mythical and wrongful teaching which contributed to some of the racist theology mentioned above. It is wrong to take away prayer books. While it would be absolutely right for a pastor to refuse to allow a false teacher to teach in a church or synagogue, it is dangerous and unwise to suggest that the government should have this power. 

4. He wanted to remove protection for Jews from traveling. 

This was inexcusable. Luther may have viewed the Jewish people as outsiders, but the Old Testament repeatedly admonished God's people not to harm foreigners living among them. He viewed all Jews in the same way we might view religious terrorists and I understand protective measures, but this sounds very ominous and I believe it was sinful because it puts people in danger.  

5. He advocated the seizure of property

Ending usury, the taking advantage of people, is good, but taking people's money and possessions because you SUSPECT that everything every Jew owns is stolen is absurd and absolutely ridiculous. It seems that there may have been some predatory lending or shark-like banking practices occurring and certainly this is wrong and sinful. But the Gospel calls for us to give up materialistic pursuits willingly, NEVER to take such things away from someone else. 

Concluding Thoughts

One Saturday, while in Seminary, I was cleaning a church located near an Orthodox Jewish Synagogue. We looked out the window to see an elderly couple walking through the parking lot in the blazing hot Texas sun on their way to and from synagogue, observing the Sabbath. They could not start their car, because that would be considered starting a fire, and their Pharisaical interpretation of the Law forbids starting a fire on the Sabbath day because they believe it is work. Jesus taught that the Sabbath was created for US, not the other way around. It was created to give us REST. It took tremendously more work for them to walk a mile or two to church than it would have taken to simply turn a key and drive. This illustrates the futility of their belief system and should evoke feelings of empathy on our part. As Christians, we should have compassion on our prodigal brothers and sisters, Jews who have not yet accepted Jesus as their Messiah. 

The greatest sadness of Martin Luther's tirade against the Jews is the harm it did to the cause of Christ and the influence it had on future generations. His biggest mistake was to think that God had rejected the Jewish people and forsaken them forever. It is true that God punished Israel. But even during their exile in Babylon, Jeremiah wrote to them: 

For I know the plans I have for you, declares the LORD, plans for welfare and not for evil, to give you a future and a hope  -Jeremiah 29:11 

JESUS was and is that plan and the hope comes through him. Jeremiah 51:5 goes on to say:

For Israel and Judah have not been forsaken by their God. 

Isaiah 54:7 further explains: For a brief moment I forsook you, But with great compassion I will gather you. God returned them to the promised land and sent the Messiah to them.

Romans 11:1 shows us that God still has His heart turned toward Israel in the same way:

Has God cast away His people? Certainly not...God has not cast away His people...

Paul then explains that we Gentiles have been grafted on to Abraham's family tree and God is more than willing to re-attach Jews who place their faith in Jesus. The book of Revelation reveals that many Jews will come to Christ. Our position toward them must always be redemptive. 

WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED?

1. The Gospel of Greed, or Prosperity Gospel is a false gospel that leads people away from the one true God and causes them to take advantage of each other

2. Racist theology is contrary to Scripture, drives a wedge between brothers and sisters and prevents the spread of the true Gospel.

3. Satan wants to corrupt children by corrupting the teaching in churches/synagogues, schools and homes. We see this actively occurring in our society. 

4. You can't judge an entire group of people based on the actions/alleged actions of a few. Stereotyping is bad. Look at how all of our nation's police have been judged by the actions of a few the same way it seems Martin Luther judged all of the Jews, and realize how unfair it is. Look at how the media has consistently portrayed country Christians as backward bumpkins. It is sinful to judge people based on the color of their skin or where they grew up. We should also remember not to judge all Muslims based on the actions of Islamic terrorists. They are also the appropriate recipients of the good news of Jesus Christ. 

How Should We Carry On?

1. For whatever good that Martin Luther and the other Reformers did, they also made mistakes. We can respect their courage, honor and positive contributions while appreciating their work, but we must also take seriously our sacred responsibility to study the word for ourselves, catch their mistakes, and correct them. 

2. It doesn't matter how much knowledge we have, if we don't have love, it all goes to waste and we will be fruitless. 

3. Our attitude must always be redemptive and centered on the good news of Jesus

4. Our language must always be redemptive, as speaking to those created in God's image and must minister grace to those who hear it

What Does the Bible Say About "Open" Marriage, PolyAmory and Polygamy?

You cannot call yourself a Christian and participate in a so-called "open" marriage or "plural" marriage. Polyamory and Polygamy are in direct and blatant defiance of Biblical teaching and anyone who engages in these behaviors cannot claim to be a follower of Christ, for Jesus clearly taught against these things. 

This behavior is forbidden throughout Scripture, receiving special attention twice in the 10 Commandments, first in Exodus 20:14 where it is written:

You shall not commit adultery

and again in Exodus 20:17 where it is written:

You shall not covet your neighbor's wife.

The term Adultery, which is na'aph in Hebrew, means to have sex with anyone other than your own spouse. Covet, or chamad, means to desire or lust after another man's wife and to desire her because of her beauty, or to want to take pleasure in her. 

These teachings are given special emphasis by Jesus in Matthew 5:27 when He said: You have heard that it was said, "Do not commit adultery," But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman to lust after her has already committed adultery with her in his heart.

I will not give attention to false teachers by naming them, but leading voices in their movement have claimed that polyamorous relationships where a married couple choose to "swing" with other married couples or allow each other to have sex with multiple partners are loving or even based on Jesus love-based ethic, etc. As it happens, the commandments not to commit adultery or covet are repeated in Romans 13:9. Do not commit adultery and Do not covet , where they are presented along with other relational commandments including Do not murder and Do not steal in the context of Love your neighbor as yourself. It goes on to say Love does no harm to a neighbor. The BIBLE defines loving your neighbor as NOT desiring his or her spouse and NOT having sex with them. And it defines adultery as harming your neighbor. 

Liberals love to cite the fact that David took multiple wives and concubines (2 Samuel 5:13) and that his son Solomon took 700 wives and 300 concubines (1 Kings 11:3). But did you know that they were sinning? God's law in Deuteronomy 17 read:

Kings of Israel shall not multiply wives for themselves.

While it is true that some of the Old Testament patriarchs had more than one wife or concubine, it is not portrayed as desirable. For example, Abraham's taking of Hagar as a concubine was the result of a lack of faith. He was only remarried to Keturah after Sarah passed away. The simple fact is that after the Law was given through Moses, no one else in Scripture is recorded as having more than one wife unless it was in a sinful context. Even the Father of Israel, Jacob's own polygamy, was clearly forbidden to future generations by Leviticus 18:18:

You are not to marry a woman as a rival to her sister and have sexual intercourse with her during her sister's lifetime.

While Jacob's situation of being married to both Rachel and Leah was a result of the deceitfulness of his Uncle Laban, Israelites were NOT allowed to look to him as an example. It was forbidden for a man of God to mistreat two sisters by making them compete for his affections or to show partiality to his children. Likewise, it is inappropriate for Christians to treat two women who are sisters in Christ in this way. While the Mosaic Law included provisions to protect any women who were already involved in a plural marriage and to insure the fair treatment of them and their sons, the proper application of this passage may be understood to forbid future plural marriages, especially when applied to a New Testament context. It is disrespectful and mistreating to use one another this way. 

Thessalonians 4 admonishes us not to take part in ANY type of sexual immorality or lust and shows that we are not to misuse our Christian brothers and sisters this way. Verse 6 delivers this stern warning:

And that in this matter no one should wrong or take advantage of a brother or sister. The LORD will punish all those who commit such sins, as we told you and warned you before.

The Letter to the Hebrews which outlines the New Covenant in the same format as Deuteronomy declares in verse 13:4

Marriage should be honored by all and the marriage bed kept undefiled, for God will judge the sexually immoral and adulterers.

One of the major claims by the promoters of this wicked movement is that if a spouse gives their partner permission to have sex with someone else, then it isn't adultery. That is an outrageous lie. You can no more give someone permission to commit adultery with another person, than you can give them permission to steal from another person, or to murder another person. Marriage is a covenant before God, so it is God you are sinning against, as well as yourself and another person who you are either taking advantage of or causing to sin. The fact that adultery is a sin is upheld by James 2:11 which states For He who said Do not commit adultery also said Do not murder. These are both equally valid commandments for New Testament Christians.. 1 Corinthians 6:9 calls it wickedness saying:

Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral....nor adulterers....nor covetous....will inherit the kingdom of God 

This passage is immediately followed by encouragement that God forgives and saves people out of those lifestyles. But you cannot claim to be a follower of Christ and teach others to sin in this way. These are lifestyles Christians teach against and urge others to repent from. In fact, church leaders are forbidden from polyamorous and polygamous activity. 

An overseer must be above reproach, the husband of ONE wife, self-controlled, sensible, respectable, hospitable and able to teach. (1 Timothy 3:2)

Adultery is any sexual relationship outside of one's covenant marriage between one man and one woman. Jesus said:

If you want to enter into life, keep the commandments: You shall not commit adultery....

There is no such thing as an "open" marriage. Polygamy and Polyamory are clearly and defiantly sins against God. Genesis 2:24 describes God's definition, purpose and intention for marriage as a covenant relationship between one man and one woman for life. Quoting this passage, Jesus clearly defined marriage. All who claim to be His followers must accept Him as the absolute and final authority on the matter. He said:

From the beginning of creation, God made them male and female. For this reason, a man will leave his father and mother and cleave to his WIFE and the TWO will become ONE flesh, so they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no man separate. (Mark 10:6-8)
----------------------------------------------------
Here are some helpful links on this subject:
http://biblicalwoman.com/more-than-marriage-whats-behind-polyamory-in-the-church/

https://theologicalmatters.com/2017/10/10/the-new-marriage-battleground-polygamy-polyamory-and-open-marriage/

Here is a link to a related post on this blog dealing with Biblical teaching on human sexuality:
http://thetrustworthyword.blogspot.com/2016/04/identity-crisis-created-in-image-of-god.html

Asherah Poles and Marching Band Shows

Band Parents should be alarmed about the amount of pagan imagery and idolatry that is appearing in marching band shows. I have been seeing more and more productions featuring young, impressionable students bowing down in front of sacred trees, phallic symbols, and goddess-costumed colorguard performers. In fact, one of the most common elements between contemporary shows is to see performers gathered in a circle around an uplifted goddess figure, bowing in homage and worship. I saw it again live, just over a week ago.

In the video shown below, the colorguard members were told that they were "a goddess the whole world worships and adores." This sounds alarmingly similar to Acts 19:27 when the head of the silversmith guild (idolmakers) referred to the ancient goddess:

There is danger not only that our trade will lose its good name, but also that the temple of the great goddess Artemis will be discredited; and the goddess herself, who is worshiped throughout the province of Asia and the world, will be robbed of her divine majesty

In the ancient cults, young girls were often used as stand-ins, or the physical personification of the goddess. This video shows a colorguard performer with wings at the center of the circle as the object of worship:

Here is an image of students bowing down before what appears to be a type of phallic symbol. 

There are many who believe that the Asherah poles forbidden in the Old Testament were phallic symbols. I personally, tend to believe they were sacred trees, and just this last weekend I saw a band whose entire show revolved around a sort of sacred tree, they even bowed down before it. The temple at Ephesus had such a tree, which I believe represented the tree of knowledge of good and evil, which was bowed down before and worshipped. This represents preferring and honoring the knowledge of man and the craftiness of Satan over the Wisdom of God. Here are some passages of Scripture about this type of worship:

You shall not plant for yourself an Asherah of any kind of tree beside the altar of the LORD your God, which you shall make for yourself. -Deuteronomy 16:21

But rather, you are to tear down their altars and smash their sacred pillars and cut down their Asherim. Exodus 34:13

They tore down the altars of the Baals in his presence, and the incense altars that were high above them he chopped down; also the Asherim, the carved images and the molten images he broke in pieces and ground to powder and scattered it on the graves of those who had sacrificed to them. -2 Chronicles 34:4 

It is possible that not every band director realizes what their drill writers and show designers are doing. Hopefully, this will serve as a wake-up call. I confess that I once programmed Danse Bacchanale, from the oratorio Samson and Delilah by Camille Saint-Saens. Even though it was based on a Bible story, it turns out that the Bacchanale was the bad, pagan part of the story. A Bacchanale is a tribute to the false god Bacchus, god of wine and revelry and is basically a big Ba'al worshipping orgy like the event that occurred when the people of Israel bowed down and worshipped the golden calf. (Exodus 32, Acts 7:39-43)  So, famous or not, the piece was a poor programming choice which I am deeply ashamed of and regret. And I believe that there were spiritual consequences to that decision. But we certainly did not have inappropriate visuals or pagan worship. I thought it was a cool sounding song with a neat Egyptian melody from one of my favorite drum corps shows of all time. Now that I think of it, Phantom Regiment had an absolutely shocking and filthy visual in that show........ This type of wild, out of control, pagan worship event is precisely what Igor Stravinsky portrayed in his piece The Rite of Spring, which incited a riot at its premiere. As it happens, this piece was featured in a show at the BOA Regional last weekend. 

I also saw a tribute to Destiny, with the image of a woman in silhuette on Banners behind the band--clearly in reference to the goddess herself, not the concept of Destiny. Isaiah 65:11 warns against worshipping this false god:

But as for you who forsake the LORD and forget my holy mountain, who spread a table for Fortune and fill bowls of mixed wine for Destiny, I will destine you for the sword and all of you will bow down to the slaughter. 

The words fortune and destiny refer to the worship of The Fates, which, not surprisingly, yet another band offered tribute to at the BOA Regional, titling their show "Fate." Spreading a table and filling bowls of mixed wine represent having communion, and welcoming the presence of this false demonic god into your life. 1 Corinthians 10:20 warns against any type of worship to a false god. 

The sacrifices of pagans are offered to demons, not to God, and I do not want you to be participants with demons.

Why is this such a big deal? Fatalism, the belief that human decisions don't matter, is antithetical to Christian hope. Equally concerning is that this IS the Ba'al worship of ancient Canaan, the same fertility cult worshipped in Babylon and eventually Israel, which caused the nation to be destroyed. Ancient pagan psalms reveal that this false faith is the very same wicked religion as the ancient Mesopotamian fertility cult which Abraham was called to come out of, which descended from the original cult of the moon goddess, Sin. This cult was the very incarnation of evil and the origin of the widespread worship of Satan. The cult of Ba'al and Asherah featured widespread prostitution, the objectification and misuse of women (and men), drug and alcohol abuse (mixed wine was laced with drugs), demon worship, false prophecy from demons, ritual cutting, child sacrifice and every deep, dark lewdness imaginable. The open worship of this cult is not only an affront to Judeo-Christian values and the fundamental ethics of civilized society, but a defiance of decency, an abandonment of morality, a degradation of human dignity and nothing less than the open celebration of prostitution and the objectification of women, which are the hallmarks of the cult. In short, it is a SIN against God. And this corrupting influence is being deliberately pushed into the lives of American children.

As music teachers, we perform both sacred and secular music. This is something we treasure as Americans and is supported strongly by the Music Educators National Conference and case law. But it is an outrageous abuse to require students to engage in acts of pagan worship. Personally, I believe that immoral and lascivious individuals are doing this on purpose to not only indoctrinate children, but perhaps to provoke a response that would end up in legislation forbidding all religious music in schools or altogether like Russia has done, plunging us into darkness and hopelessness, instead of a beautiful country that was once founded on freedom to practice the Christian faith.

For this reason, this issue must be dealt with shrewdly. It needs to be taken care of discretely, not publicly, but through private parent conversations with the Band Director, demanding that the offensive choreography be removed. Of course, polite conversation and concerned correction is preferred, but if that fails, then men of integrity on local school boards need to have private, in person conversations where it is made clear that exposing communities to such pagan filth will result in non-renewal of contracts.

While I personally know many, many wonderful people who are band directors, who work with students for every right reason and noble purpose, there are, sadly, certain influential individuals within BOA, DCI and WGI who have been pushing inappropriate behaviors, attitudes, deviant sexuality and points of view and indoctrinating impressionable students for many years. I have personally heard the stories of Christian students suffering persecution in these programs. It is time to take a stand. It is time for it to end. It is time to take back the ground that has been lost.